© 2003-2010 I.Litwar

Francois Amirault who's daily manager of de Fargues (left) and Count Alexandre de Lur Saluces who's the owner of de Fargues (right)

Château de Fargues, known as ”poor man’s d’Yquem”, produces stunning sweet wines and is a fine proof of, that there also is a world outside the classified growths in Bordeaux.
Château de Fargues has been owned by Lur Saluces family since
For many years, the present owner of de Fargues, Count Alexandre de Lur Saluces, took care of both d’Yquem and de Fargues. But after d’Yquem changed hands in late 1990s, Count Lur Saluces said farewell to d’Yquem in May 2004 – and has consequently be able to concentrate 100 % about de Fargues. Big investments in new wine-facilities and general modernisation of the property have resulted in de Fargues being top-tuned.
De Fargues is situated in the southeastern corner of Bordeaux, more precisely in Fargues commune in the southern outskirts of Sauternes & Barsac districts. The site’s name is Fargues-Le-Collen and de Fargues lies on little hill with grandiose view over countryside. In addition to wine production, de Fargues has also a big production of sweet corn, which is used as fodder for property's cattle of the famous race Bazas. There is also a big area of grass and de Fargues owns a forest of more than
Its vineyard is
Only grapes with sugar content corresponding to minimum 20 grades potential alcohol (app. 340-
De Fargues resembles a lot concerning style, compared with its famous “big brother” (d’Yquem), but costs only 1/3 of the price of d’Yquem. At its best, de Fargues is multidimensional wine with exceptional botrytis, breathtaking concentration and fascinating richness – and can easily match d’Yquem all the way.
All wines listed below have been assessed according to 100-point scale.
Château de Fargues 2008 (barrel sample) 92-95p
Tasted twice - last time in April 2009. Not consistent notes. Acidity in this wine matched fruit sweetness perfectly. This was a wine with lovely structure and great style.
Château de Fargues 2007 (barrel sample) 91-93p
Tasted in March 2008. This wine was somewhat closed and showed only some moments of its fine quality. I bet however it will vastly improve when in bottle. 91-93p.
Château de Fargues 2006 (barrel sample) 92-93p
Tasted in April 2007. This wine had very deep and intense noble rot, citrus peel, pear and acacia honey everywhere, strong and powerful on the palate with stunning balance.
Château de Fargues 2005 (barrel sample) 97-98p
Tasted in April 2006. It was an easy harvest with only 5 “tries” in the vineyard. Grapes picked were simply of so heavenly quality, that almost everything went into Grand Vin. Pale yellow. Botrytis here was simply extraordinary with fantastic depth and intensity. Very strong aromas of orange, mandarins and apricots were whirling around. This wine showed an enormous sweetness, which was perfectly supported by fresh acidity. Its incredible richness, extremely sophisticated style and impressive length completed this beauty. Will keep for at least 20-25 years. At de Fargues they hope, that 2005 vintage will be sometimes in the future a match for the 1947!
Château de Fargues 2004 (barrel sample) 90+p
Tasted in April 2005. Unstable weather during summer with hail and long harvest with outbreak of sour botrytis made it difficult to produce a wine, which could live up to standards at de Fargues. There was however deep and intense noble rot, finesse and elegance, some nuances and nice aftertaste. But hardly an exceptional vintage, because it lacked concentration and length, when tasted. We hope it will improve when in bottle.
Château de Fargues 2002 92p
Tasted in April 2006. Late harvest – finished the 1st November. Pale golden. Splendid and well-defined botrytis. There was acacia honey on the nose plus oranges, apricots and citrus/orange peel. Very elegant, refined, rich and with soft finish. This is the great wine for the vintage and can further improve in the next 10-15 years.
Château de Fargues 2001 97p
Tasted twice - last time in April 2006. Consistent notes. Pale yellow. This wine had a sublime and fascinating noble rot with incredible intensity and fabulous sweetness. Just like 2005, 2001 was multidimensional, incredibly sophisticated and with marvellous balance. The only difference between 2005 and 2001 de Fargues is concentration and degree of sweetness. But this difference is very small. Heavenly quality. Keep it for at least 20 years from now.
Château de Fargues 1999 90p
Tasted in April 2006. Golden. Fine and well-developed botrytis. Aroma of citrus, citrus peel and dry apricots on the nose. Acidity in this wine matched fruit perfectly, so balance here was intact and assured long life. An elegant and lighter version of de Fargues, which should be enjoyed in the next 10 years.
Château de Fargues 1998 92p
Tasted in March 2003. This vintage is generally better than
Château de Fargues 1997 96p
This wine has always been among my all-time favourites and makes my knees soft every time I taste it (March 2003, May 2005, April 2006, April 2007 and April 2008). Dark golden. Incredibly deep and well-defined botrytis, strong aroma of heather honey, orange peel and candied apricots. Big concentration, enormous richness and impressive length on the palate, plus fabulous marriage between sweetness and acidity make this wine something really extraordinary. Will be an astonishing enjoyment in the next 15-20 years.
Château de Fargues 1996 95p
Tasted twice - last time in May 2005. Consistent notes. Barely so exquisitely botrytised, intense and luscious as 1997, but still shows tremendously high quality. All ingredients in this wine play really beautiful together, and wine’s force lies in its many facets, perfect balance and persistent aftertaste. Complete and mighty wine, which cries for 12-18 years more in the cellar.
Château de Fargues 1990 93p
In March 2003 it had aromas and tasted of super concentrated acacia honey, was quite rich in alcohol and had fabulous botrytis, big complexity and long aftertaste. Was as formidable in April 2006 with obvious aroma of walnut crème and brown sugar on the palate. Will easily keep for additional 10 -15 years.
Château de Fargues 1988 94p
Tasted in April 2008. This was a pure class - sophisticated wine with delicious match of sweetness and acidity, mandarine/candied orange peel and honey melon flavours. A real beauty for keeping in another 5-10 years.
Château de Fargues 1986 93p
Tasted in April 2006. Golden brown. Seemed fresher on the nose and on the palate than 1990. Sublime and well-composed noble rot, grinded citrus/orange peel on the nose and palate plus aroma of caramel pudding and figs. Both sweetness and acidity here have a perfect hold of things and this results in excellent balance. Full-bodied and intense. Dazzlingly superb and lovely wine, which still ”looks” young at 20 years’ age. I bet on, that it can keep for 6-8 years more.
Château de Fargues 1983 92p
Tasted in April 2006. Raw yellow. Showed impressive botrytis, but was a bit acidic on the nose and palate with bitter aromas of orange/citrus peel. Full-bodied with big richness of nuances and extremely long aftertaste. A mistake from consulting oenologist concerning measure of sugar content in grapes, resulted in grapes being harvested a little too early, which meant less sweetness in the wine. In spite of this, this vintage is a great success for de Fargues. Can be put down for additional 4-6 years.
Château de Fargues 1970 91p
Tasted in April 2006. Yellow brown. This wine reminded a lot of 1983, but acidity here was barely so fine and well integrated. Had its peak several years ago.
Château de Fargues 1947 100p
Tasted in April 2006. Golden brown. Noble rot of aristocratic kind with extraordinary depth and intensity. Manifold nose of candied tropical fruits and oranges, apricots and rasp honey. Mega long and incredibly sophisticated taste with honeyed consistence, perfect balance and an aftertaste, which refused to end. This was a monumental wine, which rightfully can be called ”Nectar of Gods”. Count Alexandre de Lur Saluces has the feeling, that this wine easily can keep for another half a century. I tend to agree with him. It was an unforgettable show-stopper for the tasting!

Show-stopper!!
Back to main page